Or am I missing something?1% is 10000ppm, so no, you’re not missing anything. The fish, birds and waterfowl are just fine with my lake.Good to hear you are taking your local environment seriously.If humans end up causing ecological collapse in some part of the biosphere we will rationalize using technology to adapt to it. These are the kind of things that raise red flags.“We also find that the overall effect of warming on yields is negative, even after accounting for the benefits of reduced exposure to freezing temperatures.”In the real world US agricultural TFP (total factor productivity) has grown at around 1.4% per annum on average since the end of WW2. Without seeing the data I am super skeptical since it goes against a million other observations.Zoe: Greenhouses can precisely control temperature and water. Meanwhile, we all learned that glaciers come and go on a lot faster Earthly timetable than we realized (i.e., they were gone both 2,000 and 4,000 years ago not just 10,000 years ago) and, the reason for their demise obviously had nothing to do with us moderns injecting our CO2 into the atmosphere.There’s so much microclimatic variability in complex terrain that it’s very hard to find any consistent mountain signal except for a greening of the high latitudes of the northern hemisphere due to both CO2 and lengthening of the growing season.I recommend caution with forecasts up to 2099. The hippies were right. It would take magic for this the happen yes. That’s over and above the 37% increase already observed since 1900 (Figure 1). Weren’t people plant plenty of agriculture? Schlüchter learned that Hannibal didn’t cross the icy Alps: his army crossed a forest. CO2 had sunk to dangerously low levels due to sequestration by fossil fuels and marine calcifying species. This has actually been measured from satellites.

~10–13°C warmer than present).

That’s very weak evidence.All those farmers putting extra co2 in their greenhouses don’t know it’s really bad…yeah OKBehind a paywall.

“It’s going to be fairly universal that we’ll be struggling with trying to sustain food quality and it’s not just protein… it’s also micronutrients such as zinc and iron that suffer as well as protein.”“Nitrate assimilation is inhibited by elevated CO2 in field-grown wheat,” Arnold J. Bloom et al, Nature Climate Change, April 6 2014.“During a 20-year field experiment in Minnesota, a widespread group of plants that initially grew faster when fed more CO2 stopped doing so after 12 years, researchers reported in Science in 2018.”You think the satellite data is fudged? Then all that stuff dies and the process reverses. While global warming can increase plant growth in areas that are near the lower limits of temperature (e.g., large swaths of Canada and Russia), it can make it too hot for plant growth in areas that are near their upper limits (e.g., the tropics). 7. “The role of politicians is to regulate. Insights 24th June, 2020 in Europe. Thanks for your work!Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. The average apartment price per square meter has topped $11,000, making Paris now the world’s third-most expensive city.Ms.

Thus, I am not at all surprised this article has not gone viral, as it fails to support the Western media narrative. This study attempted to isolate them via multilinear regression and found:“For wheat, maize and barley, there is a clearly negative response of global yields to increased temperatures. Jeltsch-Thömmes et al. Don’t mention her name to taxi drivers.“She’s a hysteric,” said Hamza Hansal, who owns a fleet of 10 cabs, pausing next to yet another city construction site at the Place des Fêtes in the working-class 19th Arrondissement. It does not predict an apocalypse. First the plants in it grow like Hades in the Spring and Summer.

. Even if the press weren't reporting it and even if the Mairies (city halls) weren't sending out their pretty glossy printed propaganda about it, there is no denying that Paris is getting greener by the moment. O2 is ~20.95% of the atmosphere, so it should increase to ~20.95%.These two figures are the same. There is a diminishing return as you approach 3,000 ppm for most plants.

More likely those activists are fudging.You ought to read those citations. The plant community is loving it!! The hippies were right. Nevertheless, I think the approach is good because it shows that the one-sided focus on heating by CO2 is not justified!For almost 20 years I’ve been saying that you can’t base policy on such long-term forecasts, which can only be considered as fantasy and speculation.The paper predicted that the earth is going to gain nearly three times as much green matter as was forecast in the last (2013) IPCC report. Jeltsch-Thömmes et al.