However, this matter is not straightforward and it is no easy task for a physician to decide how best to treat their athlete-patient - more as an athlete or more as a patient...However, if the individual gives a great deal of value to their sporting career and is prepared to make long-term health sacrifices in order to be excellent in sport, then it might be in the patient's best interests to receive treatment that makes them well for sport, rather than well for life.Regardless of the debate about whether the rules should be changed, athletes must abide by them.Nobody is arguing that it's ethical to enter a competition and then knowingly break the rules... though a few people argue that if competitors choose to accept the risk of being caught, they should cheat if they want to.Some athletes claim that they didn't knowingly break the rules: their coaches gave them 'supplements' without telling them what they were.Is it unethical to do things to your body without being aware of the consequences?
Describe the metabolic reactions of the body, and provide a brief description of the carbohydrate, lipid, and protein metabolism. )It seems that to most people this is a question, not of tampering, but of scale.To illustrate the question further, let us consider a Premiership footballer and a sprinter.A lot of people would say that the footballer's inhaler is fine (if he really is asthmatic) but the sprinter is cheating. I propose an understanding of “natural” athletic performance by combining biological knowledge of training with an interpretation of the normative structure of sport. 18, No. Performance-Enhancing Drugs, Sport, and the Ideal of Natural Athletic Performance. This raises the question of who should have the final decision in protecting the physical health of athletes: the governing body, or the athlete him- or herself.First, it can be argued that sport ethics is already subservient to medical ethics ... For example, a sports physician cannot and ought not prescribe potentially performance-enhancing drugs, unless the athlete requires such drugs to alleviate any illness. They are cheating because their use is against the rules of the sporting federations.Interestingly, some of these objections might be negated if drugs were legalised. The following examples of tampering demonstrate varying degrees of acceptability.The practices in the first point are universally seen as acceptable. What performance-enhancing methods should be allowed in sports? 8-15. Naïveté, if that is what it is, is not unethical, but it can be argued that professional athletes have a responsibility to be aware of rule-breaking and to keep an eye on what they take or inject. You need to understand that improving your eating habits and improving your performance are related. (It may be surprising to note that laser eye treatment on athletes with healthy vision is not banned from sport. The distinctions used by regulatory bodies are sometimes criticised.For example, two similar dietary supplements can be on different sides of the line, or a previously-legal supplement can be made illegal, because of seemingly small differences in chemistry.The International Olympic Committee and other organisations single out drugs as qualitatively different from other performance-enhancing techniques.... the use of doping agents in sport is both unhealthy and contrary to the ethics of sport ... it is necessary to protect the physical and spiritual health of athletes, the values of fair play and competition, the integrity and unity of sport and the rights of those who take part in it at whatever level.
6, pp. I examine whether the distinction makes sense from a moral point of view. by Phil Hueston, IYCA YFS-1, NASM Performance Enhancement Specialist. They should be banned also because anyone using them is trying to gain an unfair advantage over those athletes who wish to maintain normal health. Here's a concept that you must understand. I argue that these arguments on their own are inadequate, and only make sense within a normative understanding of athletic performance and the value of sport. The Committee takes the view that performance enhancing drugs should be banned because they can potentially damage the health of those taking them, whether they are elite athletes who stand the risk of being detected using them, or the recreational sportsperson who is unlikely ever to be tested. Metabolism and How it Works For Athletes! (2018). If drug-taking was within the rules, would fair play and the integrity and unity of sport be preserved? Examples That Would Help Me Understand. Why are they allowed at all, if such drugs as THG are not permitted under any circumstances?There is nothing wrong with the sprinter; she could compete without her steroid (though she might not place as highly). In fact, they contain banned substances.