Because that’s how everyone has always dealt with diseases like this until 6 months ago. The virus has insufficient hosts to maintain community spread there.As long as the mask and social distancing crap persist, it will unfortunately be a long time coming.No. 0.5X? So just “everyone let’s get the disease” will be almost by definition the worst possible approach.The game ain’t over, and many countries are going to suffer a lot more. My work didn’t exactly make me happy so I decided to take a chance on something new…NVd after 4 years it was so hard to quit my day job but now I couldn’t be happier.I am making $165 an hour working from home. Once the networkers have immunity, that’s enough to slow the spread and flatten the curve.

The same person who pushes Sweden’s approach to the coronavirus will tell you that we can’t have Sweden’s health care system or their child care system. Auckland, with a third of the country’s population, is placed in Level 3 lockdown, which is essentially a stay at home order. You think there is no overlap?Your point being that suddenly we have a 22% death rate for folks over 70, up from 13% normally. To contrast, I dont know anyone who has died from coronavirus and only 2 ppl who may have been sick from it (they live in NYC but were never tested) back in April and both recovered in full rather quickly. Many millions are unemployed and have few prospects. There are no long term large trials so really we do not know. But that is absolutely the opposite of what happened.Sweden’s plan was well considered, and based on the evidence that they had. Teachers and other public employees will be begging for the economy to open fully. It’s just shocking how many people can see that and say it was totally worth it.As this article shows, people taking measures without any government mandate will depress the economy all the same, since people tend to be cautious about not getting horribly sick or not dying a horrible death.What of the deaths that we’d have with no measures taken? The natural law of Scientific evidence, as it relates to the current pandemic, bears out this economic idea.

On May 10, Dagens Nyheter—Sweden’s biggest daily newspaper—analyzed a pair of models inspired by the Imperial College of London study, which predicted as many as 40 million people could die if the coronavirus was left unchecked.

I’ve been saying that since April.We’ll be fine as long as we keep all you infected americans out.Good luck at keeping out the nerds who are determined to vacation in Middle Earth. It’s frightening, turns the legs to jelly. Sweden’s top epidemiologist Anders Tegnell says a massive decline in COVID-19 cases shows "the Swedish strategy is working.” Is he right? BizarreOr, perhaps Emperor Newsom and his like purposely rejected that alternative in favor of a power grab.I wish I lived in a community of people like you Sevo.Are you a contributor to any of the L’tarian orgs? You are a virus magnet with your petulant child conception of freedom.I have a rock that keeps tigers away.. science based Tonyism@Tony, businesses were forced to close down. This bullshit virus hasn’t even claimed a million lives.Do you comprehend how much of a fucking dupe you are? That is all.A fucking face panty with no NIOSH rating doesn’t do anything, either, than than make money for Hanes.But since the death rate is .043%, you have to be a complete sociopath or complete retard to shit on the entire economy as a treatment.And your politicized reference doesn’t explain the magic process by which closing but then opening “Safely” magically increases herd immunity.It’s pretty much impossible to educate a liberal.

It’s not always clear that herd immunity is significantly different from saturation or just noise.Well, people seem to be using it in those two different senses. The recovered (antibodies). There’s no getting around the fact that dropping all safety measures in the US would result in far more death than should be acceptable to anyone, with a no-vaccine herd immunity never guaranteed.

There are two meanings to herd immunity, I think. What ever benefit Sweden got was in part because they were ready for this virus having necessary health care systems in place, a population with faith enough to follow government guidelines, and a consistent message from the government.I don’t know how to verify this, but it is possible those with T-Cells actually never got the disease and therefore did not get antibodies.

Heads are probably rolling at darpa and the black ops divisions that we pay half a trillion to every year.three groups generate a herd immunity.

But if we’d done that, the fatalities would’ve been in the millions in America alone and tens of millions worldwide. Obama declared a public health emergency before a single American had even been infected yet.I also find it a bit facetious that they “blundered” into it through the simple method of letting everyone get it in a controlled measure.

That would save way more lives.Welcome to the Democratic Party, comrade. Then contact with the rest of the world some of whom did not vaccinate results in still more cases as occurred at Disneyland. Also, VERY commonly, persons dying of Covid-19 have comorbidity, and or advanced age.

Achieving herd immunity via exposure means maximizing the death toll.So there must be a ton of teens-50 something yr. old healthy, non-pre-existing condition Swedes dying left & right from rona, right?60 to 70% is for virtual immunity. Which is all that really matters.

If he did, he would realize that most of his articles are just speculation.This article brought to you courtesy of a mindless idiot. Stay at home orders for seven weeks. As if they are not link in some ways.“The problem I have is that most people point to the Sweden less restrictive approach with out acknowledging that Sweden has good health care and social safety nets in place.”Every month start earning more cash from $20,000 to $24,000 by working very simple j0b 0nline from home.

I think that’s the 60-80% level that people talk about. Indeed, none talk explicitly about any sort of stability or decrease in the rate of infection (though they can be inferred).